转载

360安全卫士for Linux使用结果:F*CK

测试了一把,结果显示360基本对Linux社区规范和安全常识not give a f*ck。 首先,这个deb包就是胡乱打包,依赖关系就没弄好:

$ dpkg-deb -I 360safeforlinux-3.0.0.66-stripped.deb  [...]  Package: 360safeforlinux  Version: 3.0.0.66  Architecture: amd64  Maintainer: qihu360 company  Installed-Size: 23617  Depends: libc6 (>= 2.14),libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.38),python2.7 (>= 2.7.6),openssl(>= 1.0),curl,libqt4-network(>= 4.8.5),libqt4-sql(>= 4.8.5)  Section: gnome  Priority: required  Essential: yes  Description: 360 safe for linux

但是还实际依赖了libpython2.7和libqtgui4两个库没有标明,要我手动修复。 这个打包还通过滥用Essential标记来制造卸载的麻烦。

root@debian-amd64:/home/user# apt-get remove 360safeforlinux [...] The following packages will be REMOVED:   360safeforlinux WARNING: The following essential packages will be removed. This should NOT be done unless you know exactly what you are doing!   360safeforlinux [...] **You are about to do something potentially harmful.** To continue type in the phrase 'Yes, do as I say!'  ?]  Abort.  root@debian-amd64:/home/user# aptitude remove 360safeforlinux The following packages will be REMOVED:     360safeforlinux  [...] The following ESSENTIAL packages will be REMOVED!   360safeforlinux   WARNING: Performing this action will probably cause your system to break!          Do NOT continue unless you know EXACTLY what you are doing! To continue, type the phrase "I am aware that this is a very bad idea":

关于Essential打包政策, Debian 和 Ubuntu 都只保留给最必要的包。 安装后dpkg配置时它的 postinst 脚本直接给加上了setuid。如此随意地使用setuid,还能自称是安全?

if [ "$1" = "configure" ];then     chmod u+s /opt/360safeforlinux/s360SafeForLinux [...] fi

这个的意思就是,以普通用户权限运行这个东西,它会变成root:

user@debian-amd64:~$ id uid=1000(user) gid=1000(user) groups=1000(user),24(cdrom),25(floppy),29(audio),30(dip),44(video),46(plugdev) user@debian-amd64:~$ start360 & [1] 4512 user@debian-amd64:~$ pstree -u init─┬─dhclient      ├─5*[getty]      ├─login───bash(user)───startx───xinit─┬─Xorg(root)      │         └─x-window-manage [...]      ├─urxvtd(user)      └─urxvtd(user)─┬─bash───start360(root)─┬─{BackendTaskThre}       │         ├─{BrowserHomePage}       │         ├─{CpuMemUseState}       │         ├─{FileWatcher}       │         ├─{IsolateZone}       │         ├─{LogCleanThread}       │         ├─2*[{MyThread}]       │         ├─{VdUpload}       │         └─3*[{start360}]       └─bash───pstree 

dpkg的 prerm 脚本还有奇怪的东西:

rc=`lsmod | grep "rk360" | xargs echo` if [ -n "$rc" ];then  rmmod rk360 2>/dev/null 1>&2  rm -rf /etc/360safe/360safe.ko 2>/dev/null 1>&2 fi rc=`lsmod | grep "immu" | xargs echo` if [ -n "$rc" ];then  rmmod immu 2>/dev/null 1>&2  rm -rf /etc/360safe/immu.ko 2>/dev/null 1>&2 fi 

360不仅不满足于root权限,还在用内核模块?不过这次使用中并未发现这两个内核模块。 start360 启动,然后有两个运行时怪现状:

  1. 把pid保存到 /etc/360safe/360safeforlinux.pid 。会不会遵守FHS?
  2. 疯狂扫描系统文件,powertop显示闲置状态每秒30个唤醒,笔记本电池寿命已死。会不会用inotify?

它提供了一些功能。

  • 全盘扫描。所有文件都是按照标准设计的,哪个恶意哪个不恶意真不是360能说了算的。
  • 一键清理。可以使用这个命令替代: rm -r ~/.adobe ~/.cache ~/.local ~/.macromedia ~/.thumbnails /tmp/* 。但是这些临时文件是有用的,也占不了多大空间。
  • 优化加速。就是把 update-rc.d/chkconfig 封装了一个图形界面。
  • 软件管家。360的私货app store。
  • 文件粉碎。Linux下有什么无法删除的“顽固”文件?还是重新发明了coreutils的 /usr/bin/shred ?来删除/proc试试?
  • 网盾。就是Firefox和Chrome的插件。
./etc/360safe/urlcheck ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/normalize.py ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/Firefox ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/Firefox/360webshield@qihoo.com.xpi ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/lcloud.ini ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/browserextensionsinstaller.py ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/Chrome ./etc/360safe/urlcheck/Chrome/360WebShield.crx
  • 还有二进制库的“云查杀”,QEX引擎,BitDefender引擎。不了解有什么用处。

360唯有一点用功了,就是列了一大堆非GPL的许可证:

license/zlib_license.txt license/c-ares_license.txt license/qt_license_lgpl.txt license/unrar_license.txt license/sqlite_license.txt license/elftoolchain_license.txt license/libcurl_license.txt license/7-Zip_license.txt license/boost_license.txt license/openssl_licnese.txt license/minizip_license.txt license/jsoncpp_license.txt license/protobuf_license.txt license/Noto fonts_license.txt license/qt_lgpl_exception.txt

这样人们就无权索要源代码。不过,一个安全产品不公开源代码,然后用setuid拿了root还要搞内核模块,谁知道你要干嘛?总之,360对Linux社区规范和安全常识基本not give a f*ck。

正文到此结束
Loading...