volatile引发的一个有趣的测试

转载请以链接形式标明出处:

本文出自:
103style的博客

本文是 看到 这篇文章中 “volatile 的意义?”
那一小节提供的一个例子引发的测试

volatile 的意义?

volatile有两条关键的语义:

  • 保证被volatile修饰的变量对所有线程都是可见的
  • 禁止进行指令重排序

下面的例子是用来证明下面这个观点的后半句是错误的。

由于volatile修饰的变量在各个线程里都是一致的,所以基于volatile变量的运算在多线程并发的情况下是安全的。

原测试示例

例子是这样的:

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

大家可以看看 最后运行的结果输出的 start
值是多少 ?

给 add 方法加上 synchronized 之后

add()
方法加上 synchronized
之后输出的 start
值又是多少呢 ?

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
    }
    synchronized void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

两个测试的结果

两个结果都是 100? 还是只有第二个是100 ?

其实两个结果都不是100,这是因为
main
方法对应的线程 不会等待 新创建的线程执行完。

我们可以加上时间输出看看试试:

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
                System.out.println("new thread: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
        System.out.println("main: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

控制台打印的结果:

new thread: 1583915204005
new thread: 1583915204005
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204007
start = 60
main: 1583915204007
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008
new thread: 1583915204008
复制代码

可以看到 main
方法对应的线程 先执行完了。

然后为了解决 main
方法对应的线程 先执行完, 我们加上 Thread.sleep(1000);
看看:

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private void test() {
        Runnable runnable = new Runnable() {
            @Override
            public void run() {
                add();
                System.out.println("new thread: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
            }
        };
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        System.out.println("start = " + start);
        System.out.println("main: " + System.currentTimeMillis());
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

查看控制台输出:

new thread: 1583915390819
new thread: 1583915390821
new thread: 1583915390822
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
new thread: 1583915390823
start = 100
main: 1583915391822
复制代码

去掉修饰 start 的 volatile 修饰符

然后我们试试把 volatile
修饰符 去掉试试,运行的结果输出的 start
值是多少 ?

我们修改代码如下:

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            Thread thread = new Thread(runnable);
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

查看控制台输出:

[100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100]
复制代码

就不卖关子了,这里结果没问题的原因主要是因为 创建线程的耗时 比 add
方法执行的耗时还长, 所以就相当与单线程执行了,我们可以来验证下。

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        new Test().test();
    }
    private int test() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            long t = System.nanoTime();
            Thread thread = new Thread(new TestRunnable(i));
            System.out.println(i + "_new_thred: " + (System.nanoTime() - t));
            thread.start();
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(100);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
    private class TestRunnable implements Runnable {
        int id;
        public TestRunnable(int i) {
            id = i;
        }
        @Override
        public void run() {
            long t = System.nanoTime();
            add();
            System.out.println(id + "_add: " + (System.nanoTime() - t));
        }
    }
}
复制代码

查看控制台输出:

0_new_thred: 1232700
1_new_thred: 31800
2_new_thred: 18000
3_new_thred: 24500
0_add: 62100
4_new_thred: 19700
5_new_thred: 76800
3_add: 19200
6_new_thred: 22300
7_new_thred: 24500
8_new_thred: 32000
9_new_thred: 26100
4_add: 23100
8_add: 20000
7_add: 18400
1_add: 20900
2_add: 19600
5_add: 40300
9_add: 22100
6_add: 23600
复制代码

当我们修改 add
方法的次数为 10W
次之后:

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

查看控制台输出:

[9337838, 9957329, 10000000, 10000000, 10000000, 9925170, 10000000, 9922369, 10000000, 10000000]
复制代码

修改上面的测试代码,给 start
添加 volatile
修饰符:

public class Test {
    private volatile int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(100);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

查看控制台输出:

[2292403, 2449807, 2146843, 1899033, 2120498, 4689152, 2264998, 2181451, 2266435, 2443323]
复制代码

可以发现结果也是不对的。

执行结果正确的代码

要正确输出结果我们可以修改代码如下:

public class Test {
    private int start = 0;
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }

    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }
    synchronized void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start++;
        }
    }
}
复制代码

或者

public class Test {
    private AtomicInteger start = new AtomicInteger(0);
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }
    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start.get();
    }
    void add() {
        for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
            start.addAndGet(1);
        }
    }
}
复制代码

或者

public class Test {
    private static ReentrantLock lock = new ReentrantLock();
    private int start = 0;

    public static void main(String[] args) {
        List<Integer> res = new ArrayList<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
            res.add(new Test().test());
        }
        System.out.println(res);
    }

    private int test() {
        Runnable runnable = () -> add();
        ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
        for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
            executorService.execute(runnable);
        }
        try {
            Thread.sleep(1000);
        } catch (InterruptedException e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
        }
        executorService.shutdown();
        return start;
    }

    void add() {
        lock.lock();
        try {
            for (int i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
                start++;
            }
        } finally {
            lock.unlock();
        }
    }
}
复制代码

以上

原文 

https://juejin.im/post/5e68b4146fb9a07ca1372816

本站部分文章源于互联网,本着传播知识、有益学习和研究的目的进行的转载,为网友免费提供。如有著作权人或出版方提出异议,本站将立即删除。如果您对文章转载有任何疑问请告之我们,以便我们及时纠正。

PS:推荐一个微信公众号: askHarries 或者qq群:474807195,里面会分享一些资深架构师录制的视频录像:有Spring,MyBatis,Netty源码分析,高并发、高性能、分布式、微服务架构的原理,JVM性能优化这些成为架构师必备的知识体系。还能领取免费的学习资源,目前受益良多

转载请注明原文出处:Harries Blog™ » volatile引发的一个有趣的测试

赞 (0)
分享到:更多 ()

评论 0

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址